• Wir machen akademisches Wissen zugänglich

    Hier findest du eine umfassende Sammlung unzähliger Bachelor-, Master- und sonstiger Uni-Arbeiten. Nutze das kostenlos verfügbare Fazit für einen Überblick oder um es gleich in deiner eigenen Uni-Arbeit zu zitieren. Bei Bedarf kannst du auch die gesamte hier vorgestellte Uni-Arbeit kaufen.

The Humanitarian Arena: Conflicting World Views and the Struggle over Language and Legitimacy

The Humanitarian Arena: Conflicting World Views and the Struggle over Language and Legitimacy

 

 

 

 

Art der Uni-Arbeit: Seminararbeit

Fachrichtung: Entwicklungszusammenarbeit

Autor/-in: Nadia Remde

 

 

1. Core quotation:

The humanitarian arena is not ‘out there’. It is discursively created by agencies, media and other stakeholders. (…) humanitarian situations (…) are shaped by social negotiations over inclusion and exclusion” (p.1113).


2. Argument

Based on two case studies of humanitarian interventions Hilhorst and Jansen’s ethnographic study analyses how humanitarian principles and policies work in reality and in which way actors influence the practices of aid. Their theoretical framework is based on the deconstruction of the humanitarian space idea and the deployment of the humanitarian arena concept whereby they refer to Foucault’s discourse analysis as a tool for analysis.

Taking an actor-oriented perspective they view humanitarian aid as an arena where various actors with conflicting world views meet and in which the access to and outcomes of aid are socially negotiated. For legitimatization reasons humanitarian actors present their work as politically neutral and embedded in the principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence as they construct themselves as moral actors. However, in reality humanitarian actors operate in a highly political environment in which humanitarian principles get obstructed and contextualized through the interests and strategies of various actors who interact with each other.

As the authors demonstrate through the cases of Kakuma refugee camp in Kenya and the response to the 2004 Tsunami in Sri Lanka, the responses of the beneficiaries to aid strongly shape the humanitarian arena. In the Kenya case, the refugees were no passive recipients of aid but actively strategized around the topic of resettlement as they employed a rights language to claim vulnerability and build their identity around being eligible for resettlement. Aid relations changed as the power of inclusion or exclusion into the humanitarian arena was no longer only in the hands of UNHCR but shifted to the refugees who became part of the governance system. The authors describe the relations between aid dispensers and recipients as mutually dependent as the aid agencies’ legitimacy derives from constructing the beneficiaries as vulnerable so as to justify their intervention while the recipients actively strategize around concepts such as vulnerability so as to enter the humanitarian arena as actors that can access its resources and services.


Du willst nicht nur das Fazit, sondern die gesamte Uni-Arbeit als PDF-Datei? Dann schreibe uns eine Nachricht mit Autor/-in und Titel der gewünschten Arbeit an info@grodt-webverlag.de und wir nennen dir den Preis. Zur Einschätzung: Üblicherweise bewegen sich die PDF-Preise zwischen 1,99 Euro und 19,99 Euro.

Blog info

  • The Humanitarian Arena: Conflicting World Views and the Struggle over Language and Legitimacy
  • 2020-12-30 14:33:33
Uniwissen